Intel, once the undisputed titan of the semiconductor industry, is at a crossroads. After years of ceding ground to nimble competitors and grappling with internal inefficiencies, the chipmaker is embarking on yet another ambitious recovery effort, this time under the leadership of its new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan.
Tan’s tenure has begun with a series of decisive, and at times brutal, strategic shifts, most notably a sweeping round of layoffs and a radical move to outsource Intel’s marketing functions to Accenture’s artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities.
Let’s take a closer look at these crucial choices and how they might affect Intel’s long-term stability, employee morale, and brand identity. The MovinkPad 11, a brand-new tablet from Wacom, will be my Product of the Week in the final segment.
Turnaround Playbook: Layoffs and Leadership
In March 2025, Lip-Bu Tan’s appointment as CEO signaled a clear intent for a rapid, aggressive turnaround at Intel. Known for his deep industry contacts and a philosophy of achieving “the most done with the fewest people,” Tan wasted no time in implementing his vision.
A cornerstone of this strategy has been a massive reduction in force, with reports indicating cuts of approximately 21% to 25% of Intel’s total workforce, impacting over 10,000 employees globally, and specifically 2,392 positions in Oregon alone. These layoffs are part of a larger strategy to cut down on management layers, streamline operations, and boost revenue and margins per employee. From a classical management perspective, initiating a large-scale layoff at the outset of a new CEO’s term, especially during a turnaround, is often considered a best practice. It makes it possible for the most recent leader to quickly reset the cost structure, show that they are serious about making changes, and blame the difficult but necessary actions on the “old guard” or difficult market conditions. This approach aims to create a leaner, more agile organization, theoretically better positioned for future growth. Tan himself has said that these layoffs are the beginning of a “marathon” to make Intel more agile like its rivals AMD and Nvidia. However, for Intel, this latest round of job cuts carries a unique and potentially problematic weight. A series of significant layoffs has plagued the company in recent years. In August 2024, under the leadership of former CEO Pat Gelsinger, Intel eliminated 15,000 jobs, representing over 15% of its workforce at the time. That followed another substantial reduction of 12,000 workers in 2022.
The current cuts represent the third major layoff round in just over a year. Such repeated and extensive workforce reductions can have a corrosive effect on employee loyalty, retention of critical talent, and overall efficiency. Employees who survive multiple rounds of layoffs often experience “survivor’s guilt,” increased stress, and a pervasive sense of insecurity, leading to reduced engagement and productivity.
The continuous instability could further destabilize a company already struggling with morale and talent drain, making the path to recovery even more arduous.
Marketing’s Decline: The Fading Echo of ‘Intel Inside’
For decades, Intel’s marketing prowess was legendary, largely thanks to the visionary leadership of Dennis Carter. Carter was in charge of Intel’s marketing when the iconic “Intel Inside” campaign was launched in 1991. This campaign made Intel a household name instead of just a supplier of components behind the scenes. It also created a powerful brand identity that people liked. The familiar “bong” sound and the “Intel Inside” sticker became synonymous with quality and innovation, driving billions in chip sales and establishing a new paradigm for ingredient branding in the tech industry.
However, Intel’s marketing luster began to wane after Dennis Carter left the company in 2000. The company struggled to replicate the consistent, impactful messaging that had defined its golden age. Over the years, Intel’s marketing efforts became less cohesive, often failing to effectively communicate its technological advancements or counter the rising narratives of competitors.
More recently, Intel has faced challenges in retaining a stable chief marketing officer (CMO). While specific details on CMO churn are not publicly detailed in recent reports, the broader context of organizational flux and strategic shifts often correlates with leadership instability in key functions like marketing.
The perception of a decline in the company’s brand strength and market presence is undoubtedly attributable to this absence of consistent, long-term leadership in marketing. Accenture AI’s marketing bet with Intel Against this backdrop of past marketing glory and recent struggles, Intel has announced a radical shift: outsourcing a significant portion of its marketing functions to Accenture, leveraging the company’s artificial intelligence technologies.
Internal memos suggest “significant changes to team structures, including potential headcount reductions, with only lean teams remaining” in the marketing department, which is directly connected to the new CEO’s initiatives to reduce costs and streamline operations. During the transition, some affected employees may even be required to train their Accenture replacements. Given Intel’s recent difficulties in maintaining a strong internal marketing function and retaining CMOs, outsourcing might offer potential benefits:
Aligning with Tan’s aggressive cost-cutting agenda by reducing overhead and fixed costs
The promise of a “modernization” of capabilities and a strengthening of the brand by “leveraging AI-driven technologies” to move faster, simplify processes, and reflect best practices
Utilizing the specialized AI tools and expertise of an outside company could theoretically provide a much-needed injection of efficiency and data-driven insights for a company that has struggled with agility. This would free up the remaining internal teams to concentrate on projects with higher strategic and creative value. The Promises and Dangers of AI Marketing The decision to heavily rely on AI for marketing entails significant risks as well as tantalizing promises.
Advantages of AI in Marketing
AI offers undeniable advantages in marketing. It excels at improving efficiency by automating routine tasks, such as lead scoring, email campaigns, and chatbot interactions. Its ability to perform fast and accurate customer data processing allows for deeper analysis of customer engagement and more predictable customer behavior.
AI can facilitate optimized marketing campaigns by targeting specific audiences with greater precision, identifying the most likely prospects to convert, and optimizing messaging for maximum impact. It can make initial drafts of the content, speed up editing, and offer suggestions based on consumer trends and previous performance. At an organization of Intel’s size and scope, which handles vast amounts of technical data and diverse customer segments, AI’s analytical capabilities can be instrumental in identifying market trends, optimizing ad spend, and personalizing customer experiences at scale.
Disadvantages of AI in Marketing
Relying on AI for something as inherently human as marketing carries real risks — chief among them, a loss of creativity and originality. AI can produce content, but often lacks the emotional depth, nuance, and flair that define human creativity. Campaigns that fail and weaken the authenticity of a brand can result from the outcome, which may feel mechanical or generic. For a company like Intel, which once thrived on emotional connection, that’s a serious concern.
Another significant pitfall is the risk of misinformation and “hallucinations.” AI models, while powerful, are only as good as the data on which they are trained. If the data is biased or flawed, the AI’s output can be inaccurate or even fabricated, leading to misguided marketing decisions or unfairly targeted ads.
An excessive reliance on AI runs the risk of ignoring human intuition and strategy, resulting in content that is uninteresting and misses the mark. Additionally, even though using AI for customer interactions like chatbots is effective, it frequently fails to replicate the human connection’s warmth and empathy, resulting in a transactional, cold experience for customers. Finally, data privacy concerns also loom large, as AI necessitates the collection and analysis of vast amounts of customer data, requiring robust safeguards and transparency.
Wrapping Up
Intel’s latest recovery effort, led by CEO Lip-Bu Tan, is a high-stakes gamble. The aggressive layoffs, while a standard tactic for a turnaround, risk further eroding employee morale and talent retention in an already unstable environment.
The bold move to outsource marketing to Accenture’s AI, while offering potential benefits in cost-cutting and efficiency, ventures into uncharted territory. While AI can undoubtedly enhance marketing operations through data analysis and automation, the challenge for Intel will be to ensure that this technological leap does not come at the expense of genuine creativity, human connection, and the authentic brand storytelling that once made “Intel Inside” a global phenomenon.
The success of this recovery will hinge not just on financial restructuring and technological prowess, but on Intel’s ability to navigate the complex human and brand implications of its radical transformation.
For the modern mobile creator, the dream of a truly portable yet powerful drawing and design tool has often felt just out of reach. Tablets lack precision, laptops are heavy, and dedicated drawing displays are tied to a desk. Enter the new Wacom MovinkPad 11, a device designed specifically to bridge this gap, offering a compelling solution for artists, designers, and note-takers who demand the freedom to draw wherever they are. Priced at an accessible $449.95, the MovinkPad 11 aims to be the ultimate companion for creativity on the go.
